This is an everyday story of the grooming and rape of white girls as young as 13 by a bunch of muslim men. Hardly worth reporting; we've seen it all before - and if you are a regular on this blog you know how and why they do it - Mohammed said they could, etc, etc.
The details are horrific...
Some of the girls were beaten and forced to have sex with "several men in a day, several times a week", the jury was told. One teenager told the jury she was forced to have sex with 20 men in one night.
Which begs the question: if 20 men raped her why have only nine been convicted? Where are the others?
But here comes the shocker. The BBC report includes the following paragraph...
The case, involving Asian defendants and white victims, sparked protests by far-right groups but police insist the grooming was not "racially motivated".
Yes, they reported the ethnicity of the rapists and the ethnicity of the victims! That's never happened before. In the past they have bent over backwards to avoid mentioning the ethnic aspects to the case.
That said, they have failed to report totally accurately. The scum may have been Asian but that is not their defining characteristic - they are all muslim. There will not have been any Asian Hindus, or Asian Sikhs or Asian Buddhists or Asian Christians in the group. So not full marks for the Beeb, but getting there.
And null points for the police. "Not racially motivated"? How politically correct can you get? Is it pure chance that the victims were all whites? I do not think so!
This pandering to ethnics has got to stop.