Thursday, 23 March 2017

Attack on parliament

The media is buzzing; TV schedules all over the place, journalists talking about nothing else, but what actually happened?

Early days of course, but it seems that one man rented a car, drove it along the pavement of Westminster bridge killing people and then jumped out and ran up and stabbed (to death) a police officer.

So one attacker, zero guns, zero explosives; this has to count as a minor effort, possibly even a spur of the moment thing. This is getting off lightly compared to what could have happened. With a modicum of organisation there would have been multiple attackers, they would have crashed PMQs not turned up too late, and been armed with AK-47s.  The death toll could have been substantial. We should be grateful muslim terrorists are mainly useless.

Wednesday, 15 March 2017

Marine "A" cleared of murder

Marine "A" serving life for the murder of a Taliban insurgent in Afghan has had his conviction downgraded to manslaughter. 

Of course, we now know he is Sgt Alexander Blackman.

The Court accepted his plea that he was mentally ill at the time.

Which is nonsense. He should never have been convicted. There is no evidence that the man he shot is even dead. And if he is dead, given that he had just be shot to pieces by the chaingun on an Apache, there is no evidence that Blackman's bullet did anything to cause or hasten his death.

Sgt Blackman should be acquitted, released, and his pay should be docked by the cost of the one 9mm round he wasted.

Budget crack'd already

That didn't take long. Chancellor Philip Hammond, Spreadsheet Phil to his friends, has backed down from his promise last week to raise the national insurance contributions of self-employed people to closer to those of employees. 

It turns out the Tory 2015 election manifesto has a pledge against raising taxes. 

So why did Phil even try to put them up? Long story, but here goes...

From 2010 to 2015 the Tory-led coalition government was very taxy spendy - they inherited a £600bn national debt and took it up past the one trillion mark. Eventually they got remorseful about just how badly they had managed the nation's affairs, and working on the assumption they would lose the 2015 general election they wrote into law that taxes could not be increased and nor could the national debt - much. (They were taken by the American debt ceiling legislation and wanted a ceiling of their own.) However, in this legislation raising the self-employeds' NICs was not banned.

So when Excel Phil considered raising that tax, rather than treating the promise in the manifesto as gospel, he took his lead from the law which they had intended to apply to a Labour government, and the law allowed him to raise the taxes. So he did.

And now he has backed down. But why? Does this indicate strength or weakness?

Plenty of backbench Tory MPs are furious. They wanted him to stick to his guns because otherwise Corbyn would be shooting straight into an open goal.

But the political calculus at Numbers 10 and 11 was more nuanced than that. Phil and Theresa decided that Labour are so weak that they could leave the goal undefended and Corbyn still wouldn't hit it.

And it seems they are right. They U-turned and nothing bad happened. Final message: we're so strong that we can act weak and it will make no difference at all.

Later today the Prime Minister will call the Ginger Nut and say, "Regarding you wanting another Scottish referendum.... Whatever."

Wednesday, 8 March 2017

Budget, Spring 2017

Chancellor Philip Hammond has just delivered his 'last Spring budget', mainly because his next budget will be in Autumn this year and next year he will have a Spring statement instead. He rose at 12:37 and with an easy jokey manner told us about everything he had already told us about on numerous TV programmes. He was helped by a slew of good news: unemployment is down, employment is up, and growth is predicted to rise to 2% this year (albeit falling somewhat in future years until it finally rises to 2% again in 2020.)

Hammond: "Sorry, this is the spreadsheet bit."

However, he did have to admit that inflation will be above target at 2.4%.

His one big bite into the taxpayer was increasing national insurance on self-employed people and removing tax loopholes. The rest was giveaways: cash for the regions, Scotland, Ireland and Wales. After handing £200m to the Scots Hammond tried to drum up a cheer from the SNP but they were stony faced.

He introduced ‘T levels’ as a technical equivalent to ‘A levels’ but we already knew about them. There will be 15 T levels which will simplify the current hundreds of vocational qualifications.

You have heard of apprenticeships and internships, well now there is a new buzzword: returnship. The government wishes to support these. They are people returning to work after absence for pregnancy or other career break. The government is keen on returnship and money was thrown at them.

The chancellor doubled free childcare to 30 hours per week.

The tax rate thresholds will be:

                                        Next year                             By 2020
Basic rate (20%)              £11,500                                 £12,500                                
Higher rate (40%)             £45,000                                 £50,000

Philip Hammond sat down after 54 minutes.

Jeremy Corbyn rose to reply for the opposition and spoke for almost as long. He delivered a pre-scripted rant covering the 2000 people who sleep rough last night, the 3000 who got their meal from a foodbank yesterday, the 5 million children in poverty and the public sector workers who have not had a pay rise for 7 years. He did not actually address anything the chancellor said and asked rhetorical questions that were so long and confused that he forgot to answer them.

 Corbyn: "...and one boy didn't get his pocket money!"

Unfortunately, he lost the interest of the Labour woman beside and behind him who preferred to go online and check their likes.

How many tweeters can you count in this picture?
And why are they all women?

The use of electronic devices in the Commons is running out of control. Probably this should be banned.

All in all, a budget of no consequence with all the real excitement postponed to this year’s next budget in the Autumn.